top of page

TBDCyber Research | Agentic AI Security

Your IAM Program Was Not Built for This 

Non-human identities already outnumber your employees 80-to-1. Agentic AI is about to make that problem structurally ungovernable.

By end of 2026, non-human and agentic identities will exceed 45 billion, surpassing the global human workforce by a factor of twelve.

 

They authenticate, authorize, spawn sub-agents, chain tools, and operate 24/7 at machine speed. Your PAM, IGA, and IDP tools weren't designed for any of that.

This paper is written for security leaders and architects (CISOs, IAM program owners, and enterprise security architects) who are already fielding agentic AI deployments and are trying to understand what governance actually requires, not just what vendors are selling.

 

It does not prescribe a single product solution. It maps the problem: where the governance gaps are, why incumbent vendor categories leave them open, and what organizational decisions security leaders need to make before the next wave of agentic deployments lands on their stack.

"Identity is becoming the primary control plane for managing AI risk. Yet most organizations' identity programs were not designed with autonomous agents in mind."

 

 The Ungoverned Machine, TBDCyber

What this Whitepaper Covers

  • The Identity Paradox: Why traditional IAM's three pillars (authentication, authorization, auditing) fail structurally when applied to autonomous agents, not as a maturity gap, but as an architectural one.
     

  • The Governance Gap by the Numbers: 94% of organizations lack full visibility into NHI. 40% of cloud NHIs have no defined owner. 97% carry excessive privileges. The data behind the exposure.
     

  • Shadow AI and Third-Party Agent Risk: Ungoverned citizen-developer deployments and vendor-embedded agents that operate inside your environment without ever appearing in your identity inventory.
     

  • Forensic Ungovernability: Why standard logs are insufficient to establish accountability when an autonomous agent causes an incident and what that means for regulatory exposure and insurance claims.
     

  • The Vendor Landscape: How PAM, IGA, IDP, NHI, CNAPP, and behavioral vendors each approach the problem and where each category's structural gaps remain regardless of product maturity.
     

  • Governance Considerations for Security Leaders: Practical framing for how to approach agentic AI identity governance before formal standards catch up with operational reality.

Put Governance Into Practice

​

Reading the paper is the first step. These two tools help you apply it.

​

How Governed Is Your Agentic AI, Really?


A structured self-assessment to score your organization's current posture against the governance dimensions this paper defines.

​See Where Your Vendors' Coverage Actually Ends


A mapping of PAM, IGA, IDP, and CNAPP vendors against agentic AI governance requirements.

Contact Us

Address your agentic AI governance challenges now.  Contact us  to learn more.

bottom of page